Force of Good

Business Clusters

Aug 05, 08 in Business, Internet, Startups   10 Comments

Last week I posted an article highlighting consumer technology startups in Atlanta with a promise to explain why not many of them make it big.  Here is that explanation.

It stems from the work of Michael Porter.  Porter is the preeminent scholar of our time on the subject of business strategy and competitiveness.  If you have any formal business training you know of his work.  In 1990 Porter wrote The Competitive Advantage of Nations where he introduced the theoretical framework (not only software development uses frameworks) of business clusters. 

A cluster is simply the geographic concentration of interconnected businesses, suppliers, and associated institutions in a particular field.  Clusters come in all ages, shapes, and sizes.  Film production in Hollywood, technology in Silicon Valley, and thoroughbred horses in Kentucky, all are examples of clusters.  Heck even the NYC diamond district which mostly comprises one block on one street is a cluster.  Clusters are everywhere and one can easily surmise given the title of the book that clusters create competitive advantage.  And they do.

Well if they do I want some where I live and this of course leads to the question of how clusters are formed.  In a report entitled "Clusters of Innovation Initiative: Regional Foundations of U.S. Competitiveness" funded by the Council on Competitiveness and authored by Porter the following was explained as ways to enhance the development of clusters:

• Clusters can be strengthened by increasing awareness of the cluster among local firms and organizations: Not only must firms be aware of the presence of a local cluster, they must also get together and coordinate activities to improve the cluster’s business environment.  Acceptance of new companies is important if the cluster is to grow quickly and reach a critical mass.
• New firm and cluster opportunities arise at the intersection of existing clusters:  Economic development strategies can leverage these opportunities to diversify a regional economy.
Anchor companies play a disproportionate role in seeding cluster development:  Anchor companies support cluster development by acting as magnets for other major companies; organizing other companies in the cluster for collective action; supporting projects that improve the local quality of life; and producing numerous spin-out companies, which strengthen key elements of the cluster (emphasis mine).
• Institutions for collaboration can significantly increase the success rate of start-up companies:  Cluster development depends in large part on generating new companies from within a region.  Successful regions almost always have a hospitable environment for start-ups.

Another important finding of this study was the outcome of The Cluster Mapping Project.  The Cluster Mapping Project identified 41 types of clusters in the U.S. economy.  While any given region will have some employment in the vast majority of these clusters, regional economies are typically very strong in only a handful.  So what clusters are present in the broad Atlanta regional economy?

It just so happens that Porter also wrote yet another report entitled "Clusters of Innovation Initiative: Atlanta-Columbus" which answers that question.  Running 168 pages it actually answers that question, though aging a bit, in great detail.  The report identifies financial services, transportation/logistics, and information technology, as strong Atlanta regional clusters.  Yes technology. 

The Atlanta technology cluster was the ninth largest in the United States (population appropriate if you will) and the second fastest growing in the country.  The report further identifies what it calls communications services (think telco and Internet), and software development as strong within the tech cluster.  And believe it or not it even mentions Web development as a well established cluster.

The report lays out the development of Atlanta's technology cluster as such:

Atlanta’s information technology cluster draws its roots from Atlanta’s historical strengths in telecommunications and more recent strength in media companies.   In the 1960s and 1970s, telecom companies like AT&T , GTE, and WorldCom expanded operations as the region grew and telecom expanded throughout the country.  Turner Broadcasting, CNN, and Cox Communications were established in the 1980s to offer both cable service and new television content.  These companies found Atlanta to be fertile ground because of its skilled technical workforce that remained in the area after World War II and the strong flow of new talent provided by Georgia Tech’s industrial and electrical engineering programs.

In the late 1970s and early 1980s two software companies, Management Science America and Peachtree Software, enjoyed strong growth, and when sold to larger companies, made their leadership teams wealthy. The success of these firms and their founders did not result in an immediate boom in software or info tech firms, as was the case in other smaller regions.  Instead, the impact of these firms’ success was somewhat “lost” in the economy of a major metro area where big companies, major banks, and real estate developers were the primary job providers and held public “mindshare.” 

It was not until 1997-98, with the success of MindSpring, one of the first large national Internet service providers, that a widely recognized anchor firm developed.  MindSpring’s success and a growing national market encouraged other Internet-based entrepreneurs to expand businesses based in Atlanta including iXL, a web developer, and Internet Security Services, an Internet security firm.  The business community, universities, media, and existing venture capital firms lined up to support the development of Internet firms in the wake of these successes and the growing recognition that the “new” economy was real. 

And goes on to conclude:

Atlanta’s information technology cluster has thrived over the last five years.  Building from regional strength in software, communications, and financial services, entrepreneurs have established Atlanta as a broad-based IT region. Through state-led investments in research, education and infrastructure, an innovative technology business incubator, and the efforts {of} multiple private sector entrepreneurs, Atlanta has developed a broad-based cluster.  Seeing significant growth only over the past three years, Atlanta got a “late” start in the e-commerce and Internet area of this cluster, but is now home to a number of nationally recognized firms like WebMD, ISS, and MindSpring. The entrepreneurs who started these firms have been critical in the development of the cluster, both through the success of their firms and through the personal and corporate investments they have made in other regional firms.

Now there are some obvious factual errors in the report but really only one that bears correcting for my purpose.  Unlike the folks at MSA and ISS, the entrepreneurs that started iXL, MindSpring, and WebMD have not made broad investments that produced numerous spin-outs within the Internet cluster (for a variety of reasons that are either obvious or best discussed over a beer).  iXL, MindSpring, and WebMD did not act as anchors. And that is the root cause for the lack of a strong consumer Internet cluster producing large and successful companies in Atlanta.

But there is a new hope, which I will discuss next week.

Comments

Great post Lance. A lot to digest. I thought this was an interesting clip from the report you cited. I don't think this is quite as true now as it was when the report was written in 2001 (it was released in early 2002):

Supply of Risk Capital. Local risk capital is much more plentiful in Atlanta today than it was ten years
ago. Many of the entrepreneurs interviewed stated that over the last decade, it had become much easier to
finance firms through local angel and VC firms. According to one technology entrepreneur, “today there
are seven VC firms of significant size and a number of smaller firms. Angel networks are in place and
growing. Technology start-ups have a much easier time in securing local financing than five years ago.”55
Atlanta survey respondents report that regional access to risk capital is sufficient to meet their funding
needs. Most entrepreneurs we interviewed said that local VCs were accessible and helpful, although some
stated that they still needed to search outside the region for initial funding and that the pace of VC deals
in Atlanta was not as fast as that in Silicon Valley.

Paul Freet  |  Aug 05, 08 at 09:16 AM

Lance,
You make a great point about the clusters and that we do have one. You also made a good point about re-investment needing to be a larger part of the growth of the cluster.

In response to the clusters yes we have one but you also have to look at critical mass and effectiveness of the cluster. Are we spawning developments, disbursing and re-spawning new one's? We have a cluster and just because we are #9 on the list of cities this is a far cry from a great thing. If you were to look at other famous clusters you are hard pressed to even think of a second cluster for that specific industry, and if you can think of more than 2 you could never make it to 9 and if you did you are a super human. So I am not sure #9 is something to be proud of rather should be looked at as a measure of where it is and where we want it to go (which i think is what you were trying to do).

I think for the cluster to grow and be truly successful we need more involvement form outside forces, such as business publications covering the start up community, more public awareness of the happenings of the community, a welcoming community where people are willing to come to start their company because they know it can happen here. I think we are moving in this direction but not there yet (obvious because were #9). I think in addition to outside forces inside the community we should reach out more to publications, and others as a whole to let people know we are here, and we are making things happen. People can argue with me on this but there are lots of things happening (with or with out money). I don't think we should wait to see if someone gets funded to talk about them. If they have a great vision at bare minimum we should talk about that to give others hope and inspiration and help everyone out. Lets be honest lots of companies fail, but that is not the point, the point is people are more willing to try if they know there is support there, and the people starting those companies will get better, the community will get stronger and good things will happen.

The large "Anchor Companies" as you call them I completely agree with. We need these companies and are some on the way? Did you listen to Mitch Free's podcast over at Startup Lounge? MFG.com might be a great "Anchor Company" their company and Mitch himself could possibly be large parts to the new clusters growth.

In closing I want to address
"Atlanta’s information technology cluster has thrived over the last five years. Building from regional strength in software, communications, and financial
services," If we have thrived as a community in these fields then why haven't there been more efforts from entrepreneurs to develop new companies and with help from these "thriving" sectors. Is it the fact that people (possible entrepreneurs) don't see the prospects of a start up company taking off down here? Or do we just not breed the entrepreneurial spirit in these sectors? I think we do breed them, so it must be the first question that people don't think it is a great place to start a business. We need to change this were people see the community here to support them, see the progress of small start up's (which we have a lot of). I think these things will help us build our cluster and foster a better community.

Mathew Sweezey  |  Aug 05, 08 at 10:10 AM

Paul & Mathew, thanks for the comments. My aim with this particular article was not to really explain how to make things better but much more to simply answer the question why. It is pretty interesting to me that many of the comments on FoG and other blogs reach the same conclusions on how to improve. Within the Atlanta report it also cites the relative weakness of amount of risk capital, which should not be confused for the relative weakness of the risk capitalists.

Lance  |  Aug 05, 08 at 10:31 AM

Lance-

Great post. I am glad you did this cool bit of research into clusters! I am a big Michael Porter fan myself. I had no idea that he wrote about Clustering in Atlanta, though. Very cool.

Alan

Alan Pinstein  |  Aug 05, 08 at 01:30 PM

Lance, thanks for pointing out Porter's cluster work. I have two comments:

1. I think the importance of geographical clusters is declining over time as web technologies make "location" less important, professional financing less important, and virtual teams more productive. But I think this will take years to play out. In ten years I expect that geo-independent clusters of *industry expertise* will be more relevant than *geographical* clusters.

2. In defense of entrepreneurs behind one of the 3 bubble-era Atlanta hits (iXL, Mindspring, WebMD): I think Jeff Arnold (WebMD founder) gets a bad rap in local tech circles, perhaps because he doesn't spend time networking locally. But Jeff started and/or funded multiple local tech businesses, two of which had successful 9-figure exits (N2 Broadband, HowStuffWorks). And several early WebMD execs have had success locally in tech (e.g. Reggie Bradford). There are also several 2nd-level execs from iXL and Mindspring who have done great things (e.g. Bill Nussey).

Count me as optimistic about the Atlanta tech startup scene, despite the occasional setback (like Haynie taking Appcelerator out west).

Wayt

Wayt King  |  Aug 05, 08 at 01:44 PM

Wayt, two great points. To clarify, I don't think those entrepreneurs need defending and my purpose was not to bash anyone. Like you I am optimistic about the Atlanta startup scene and increasing awareness of activity is part of the story.

Lance  |  Aug 05, 08 at 02:18 PM

It's also disappointing how few (if any?) entrepreneurs emerged from the BellSouth/Cingular/ATT universe. This could be a hot bed for mobile technology innovation.

Edward O'Meara  |  Aug 05, 08 at 04:20 PM

Clusters are important and have been proven to be a driver for success. I do believe that. What are some of the clusters that exist that ought to be generating more startups and seed funding? How about online banking? CheckFree, Global Payments, ChoicePoint, S3, TSYS, Firethorn, FTrans? What about travel? Delta, Worldspan, TRX? What logistics companies might be clustering around UPS?

One thing that would really drive a cluster is having a buyer in the space. Someone acquiring the startups ala Cisco.

Paul Freet  |  Aug 05, 08 at 05:36 PM

There's a strong cable cluster up here in the Northern suburbs with Scientific Atlanta (Cisco)and Arris (largest maker of cable modems in the world?). Larger companies like Motorola, Phillips and Hitachi have shops here and there are dozens of small shops selling niche components to these companies.

Todd Merrill  |  Aug 06, 08 at 04:45 PM

We've been asked to train a delegation of successful bio-medical and equipment CEOsfrom St. Petersburg Russia in "business clustering'. They are most interested in the successes and failures and lessons learned with cluster development. They will come to Silicon Valley, but hope to learn the latest from America clustering. Is anyone interested in working with us to develop the best program possible for these highly-motivated young Russians?

Sharon Tennison, president, Center for Citizen Initiatives (CCI)
www.ccisf.org, www.russiaotherpointsofview.com

sharon tennison  |  Sep 01, 08 at 12:36 PM

Post a comment

Name:

Email Address:

URL:

  Remember me?
Comments: