Removing Twitter From Facebook

I am removing the Twitter application from my Facebook account.  I am doing this because I spent about four hours with some of the folks I came of age with at my high school class reunion.  It was good time.  And I learned a few things.  Most of these folks are not in the world of tech so they have a different perspective about social networks.  A perspective more like mainstream America.

It is nothing new to me, but people that are on Facebook and not on Twitter do not understand the machine language to operate Twitter.  Too many @ replies and shortened URLs take a Facebook user out of context.  It's confusing to them.  Why bring confusion to communications?

Something that I did not realize before, but makes total sense now, is my twitter comment stream is heavily populated with information about my work.  Too much information about my work for mostly non-professional contacts and friends.  To them it is comment pollution.  Who wants that?

Perhaps the most essential thing that I learned was that I have fallen completely out of touch with some people that were important to me.  It saddens me.  I am going to spend a little effort to change that.  Maybe more than a little.  You won't be reading much about that here, it's an offline personal endeavor. 

And you also won't be reading my Twitter updates on Facebook any longer.

October 5, 2009  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in Fun, Internet, Personal

Do Recommendations Matter?

A had a wonderful conversation with Shannon Russo yesterday of Kinetix.  Kinetix is a talent acquisition and management company.  As we met at New Media Atlanta much our conversation was about social media used in the world of staffing.

Shannon has some deep knowledge about the industry and particularly the use of LinkedIn.  I do not use LinkedIn often.  Mostly responding to requests that hit my in box.  One of the tidbits Shannon told me is that recommendations matter on LinkedIn.  My reply was a perplexed "really?"

I had never given it much thought.  Asking people for recommendations seemed a little cheesy to me (I think I may have one from a person that called me out on a social network for having none so I asked to him to recommend me).

What do you think?  Do recommendations matter on LinkedIn? 

If your answer is yes I could use some love.

October 1, 2009  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in Social

Back Channel Behavior

Buried deep within the comment stream of Don’t Blame BackNoise was a remark by Jeff McConnell talking about the different uses of the back channel at New Media Atlanta and CapVenture.  With his permission I lifted the comment as it seems worthy of discussion.

I attended the Cap Ventures showcase last night and found Backnoise to be a great tool and used well. I’m not sure why it was so much different at NMA than at Cap Ventures but it
could be any of the following:

  1. Extensive dialog to-date made people aware of the unofficial “rules” and bad behavior from NMA was avoided.
  2. Audience was “different” than NMA. CV09 was mainly investors,
    early stage CEO’s, ATDC, TAG, and ATA leaders. Don’t know about NMA.
  3. Audience was “wanting” and in some cases “willing” these presenters to succeed. They were all pitching their dream.
  4. The 34 presenters were limited to 3 minutes each, so even if they were not great they were over quick.
  5. CV09 was free and that tends to increase your tolerance for weak content if it occurs.
  6. There were clear leaders on BackNoise setting the tone of the conversation.

In any event, it worked well from my point of view and there is a reason. May be one (or more) of the above or one I’ve missed but the results were vastly different for some reason.

There were actually two active back channels during the CapVenture.  In addition to BackNoise the good folks at EventHive set up a channel.   You can currently view the archived BackNoise stream and EventHive stream.

One of the more interesting things that occurred is that I set off some intended or unintended bad behavior on the EventHive “Best Presentation” vote when I asked “can people that are not viewing the presentations vote?”  EventHive requires non anonymous log in using Twitter or Facebook credentials.

What do you folks make of that?

September 30, 2009  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in Internet

Hands On Social Media

Hands On Small Business is a program that intends to deliver over 100 events in October and November in 20 cities across the United States and Canada.  Atlanta is one of those cities.

Hands On will be just that.  The sessions are designed to offer practical advice, direct instruction,
and application tips for online and social media solutions to help small businesses and entrepreneurs.  Tessa Horehled will be leading the Atlanta events which are being held at ATDC.  The sessions are free and open.  You can sign up for one of the Atlanta sessions here.

Hands On Small Business was organized by the fine women of Kirtsy, that I love from afar.  How can you not love a “social media platform of pure goodness.”

 

  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in atdc, Internet, Marketing

Don’t Blame BackNoise

People are good.  It's a fundamental belief of mine.  People should be friendly and courteous.  It is our obligation as members of a somewhat advanced civilization to treat other individuals with dignity and respect. To be
cooperative, direct, honest and open. To also be graceful with measured words
and actions.

I say this as I ponder the New Media Atlanta conference that took place last Friday.   If you have not heard by now it was, to say the least, a quite interesting event.  Seems that a little app called BackNoise become a very important part of the proceedings.  Allie Sullivan, Paul Chaney (two places) and Stacy Williams, with this thoughtful article, have nice summaries of the proceedings.  All of these folks are missing a few fundamental factors that led to the digression that they describe.

I have led and participated in my fair share of conferences in my day.  I understand how hard it is to put something together.  I understand how thankless the task can be.  I applaud Matt Fagioli and Brad Nix for taking upon themselves to put New Media Atlanta together.  But while I know Stacy and respect her a great geal, I am going to respectfully disagree with her.  The conference was not great.  It opened slow.  With an hour of sponsors trotting across the stage.  It started out so slow that the first scheduled speaker, Jeff Turner (who by the way did a masterful job moderating an afternoon panel), got up on the stage and said, to paraphrase, "the conference sucked thus far" according to BackNoise.

It really did not suck, but the slow opening led to people distracting themselves and many of them ended up on BackNoise.  Once people got there they did not leave.  They did not leave the back channel because the conference content was too basic for the audience.  A negative comment vicious cycle ensued.

But you can't blame this on a simple Web application.  BackNoise is merely a thing.  A thing that lets anyone create back channel conversations with zero friction. I like to think about it as event specific Usenet, though others prefer an IRC analogy.

Regardless, just like Usenet, IRC, and any other online community, it is up to the community members to set acceptable standards. The New Media Atlanta community failed to set standards that many of the participants deemed to be acceptable.  But you can't blame that on BackNoise and the presence of anonymity.  Much of the commentary on the Internet is carried out under anonymity and unidentifiable pseudonyms.  Many complained of the anonymity.  Few called out participants that were carrying out what they deemed unacceptable behavior.  Even fewer, including those that are now blaming BackNoise and anonymity, took to posting under a user name. 

Most just stared and watched the train wreck.  They just watched, without trying to push the car off the tracks. They watched without calling attention to the wrongness of what was transpiring.  The organizers did not participate or guide the back channel in any meaningful way.

I am one of the very, very few that put my name on some comments (due to my sense of self importance if you were to believe the back channel).  I did this to try and diffuse the situation.  And yes, like many of the speakers, I was attacked.  So what, there is nothing to fear from those that are anonymous. 

When it came time for Chris Brogan to get on stage what he did was brilliant.  He confronted what he feared the most head on.  He shed his presentation (if he had one) and projected BackNoise on the stage screen during his speech.

Are they some things that could be done to improve BackNoise and make it a more conference friendly?  Sure, I have been telling Keith Mcgreggor, the creator, for some time I believe this to be the case (BTW what is better about telling someone they suck using your real name rather than anonymously).  And Keith is currently actively seeking ways to improve BackNoise based on what has transpired.

But if you are feeling icky and sick as a result of what happened at New Media Atlanta, don't blame it on BackNoise.  Look in the mirror.  Next time a back channel pops up at a conference that you are attending don't just watch.  Take an active role in setting the norms and standards on what you want the community to be.  Don't complain after the fact.  Do something in the moment to lift the conversation.  Do something good.

September 28, 2009  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in Internet, Marketing, Presentations

AtlantaNewMedia Backnoise

<embed code deleted>

You can type in the little white box to join in.

Update: I had to remove the BackNoise iframe as the refresh was creating a usability issue with reading FoG. Will update if/when fixed.

You can go follow the conversation at http://backnoise.com/?nmatl

September 25, 2009  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in Internet, Marketing, Presentations

Rich or Famous?

Would you rather be rich or famous?

It's a pretty simple question.  And one that I used to ask quite a lot during interviews when my company was hiring 10 or more people a month.  It's a good interview question.  Not to only get people's initial response, but to actually hear their rationale.  And to understand what motivates them (richies want monetary rewards, famers want public recognition) and how they might fit into the culture of the team. 

One of the most common responses is "both".  Unacceptable answer.  You only get to choose one or the other.  There are just twoe types of people in the world.  Those that want to be rich, those that want to be famous.

It applies to entrepreneurs as well.  Either they want to be rich or they want to be famous.   The richies quietly work on building a nice product that customers want to use and grow their business.   The famers work on creating something cool that a lot of people might notice via something like TechCrunch.

So what about you?  Would you rather be rich or famous?

September 23, 2009  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in Entrepreneurship

Take The Money

Big news last week in the world of Internet applications was Mint's acquisition by Intuit for $170 million.  It seemed to set off quite the storm. 

The 37signals blog called it the result of a "VC-induced cancer" to which Fred Wilson responded with his thoughtful post on how exit decisions are made.  And it seems that the decision was made by Mint founder Aaron Patzer (which would be the case according to Fred's analysis.)

Here's the deal.  There are three types of successful exits for startup founders.  You get a new car, you get a new house, or you get a new life.  When someone offers $170 million for your startup you get a new life, whatever type of life you want.

You take the money. 

September 21, 2009  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in Internet, Startups, Venture Capital

Faster Not Fat

I can't sleep.  And it made me think of this theory that I have heard from time to time over the past sixty days or so.  "I'll sleep when I'm funded" or something to that effect.  It's the result of a Russell Jurney asking Hacker News "how much do you work?"

Here's some news of my own.  Regardless of the results of the poll, the mean was 57 hours and the mode 60, no investor wants to fund a company so that the founders can sleep more.  And any startup that has employees that work less than 50 hours a week is not managing their employees correctly or their funds frugally. 

Investors fund startups to capitalize on an opportunity.  So they can go grow.  Only in the instance where new management is brought in as a part of the funding event have I seen a founder of a funded startup work less rather than more after a funding event.  I have been confidentially asking quite a few funded CEOs if they work less as a result of their funding event.  Every one said they work more.  They might be more efficient because they can afford some things to make them so, but they work no fewer hours.

Investors don't want you to take a break when they fund you.  They want you to go faster.  They will tell you to go faster.  They will demand you go faster. 

If you get funded you are not going to get fat.  You are going to go faster.

September 17, 2009  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in Entrepreneurship, Startups, Venture Capital

Socialnomics

Went to the Lift Summit today and saw Erik Qualman give a great presentation on socialnomics. He kicked it off with this kickin video.

Back in the day we used to joke around that the answer to hitting our quarterly numbers was porn. According to the vid social media has overtaken porn as the number one activity on the Web. Perhaps the answer to hitting your numbers going forward is social media.

In addition to creating killer videos Erik is the author of Socialnomics: How social media transforms the way we live and do business.

September 15, 2009  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in Internet, Marketing