Startups in 12 Quotes

Yesterday I gave a talk to the Georgia Tech Young Entrepreneurs Society.  The vast majority of the students that are part of the group are trying to get a startup off the ground or already working on a startup.  I decided to base my talk mostly around the "Quote of the Week" feature of this blog.  The presentation deck is comprised of 12 quotes, 10 of which previously appeared on FoG.  Not sure if the deck will translate well without the commentary, but the quotes encapsulate a dozen things I would tell any startup.

Thanks to Ajai Karthikeyan, who founded the group and let me join folks like Stephem Fleming, Jeff Levy, and Sig Mosley that have been part of the speaker series they put on.

Update:  I received this rather exciting news in my email box:

Hey lanceweatherby!
You are a Presentation Rockstar on SlideShare!
Your presentation Startups in 12 Quotes has been selected amongst the 'Top Presentations of the Day' on the SlideShare homepage.

March 3, 2009  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in Entrepreneurship, Startups

Build My Timbuk2 Bag

Team Skribit gave me a Timbuk2 Bag In A Box gift card for the work I have been doing with them.  And what I am going to do with it is build my own bag.  I have selected the medium laptop messenger as my bag of choice.  Now I need to design it. 

Issue is I am not much of a designer.  I can provide design direction.  I can even tweak design.  But I am not much good at design itself.  So I am going to have a little contest and have you design my bag for me.  Winner gets the choice of a $20 iTunes or Amazon gift certificate. Spend 15 minutes.  About $80 an hour.  Seems fair.

Here are the rules.

  1. Go to the Build Your Own Bag page.
  2. Select Laptop Messenger.
  3. Choose Medium size.
  4. Design the outside of the bag.
  5. Go to the next step and select the color of the logo.
  6. Make a comment on this post indicating your design by midnight on Sunday March 8.
  7. Use the following form in your comment: left panel color/center panel color/right panel color/logo color.  For example Navy/Rocky Road/Army/Olive. (Timbuk2 really needs a save/share function).
  8. Winning bag design will be selected and announced on FoG by midnight on March 11.
  9. The winner of the contest will be decided by Erika Brookes who has been described as an expert on being both technically smart and chic, SJ who has a bit of a bag fetish, and me.
  10. I don't have to actually use the winning design.
  11. If I don't use the winning design the winner still gets the $20.
  12. One entry per person.
  13. I can make up more rules as we go along.

That's it.

Make something beautiful.

March 2, 2009  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in Fun, Games, Open Source, Personal

Resolving to Grow

Lost amid all the chatter here and on Hacker News responding to Paul Graham's "Can You Buy A Silicon Valley" was this little tidbit that flew by in the twitter stream.

Last week the Georgia General Assembly favorably reported on a resolution (SR 166) creating the SITE (science, innovation, technology, and energy) to Grow Georgia Alternative Financing, and Entrepreneurship Study Committee.  The goal of the study is to determine how to invest public funds and greater support the growth of entrepreneurship to make Georgia the "#1 DESTINATION FOR ENTREPRENEURS" (all caps theirs).

Here is the complete resolution

I hope the representatives involved in the study read the Paul Graham plan. I really don't think they would support such a radical idea. An idea that requires density of startups and the most logical place for that density is Midtown Atlanta. But I do think it will foster fresh ideas to improve the entrepreneurial state of Georgia.

The sponsors of the resolution are Amos Amerson, Mike Cheokas, Bill Hembree, and Bob Smith.  It would not hurt to drop them an email sharing your thoughts on what needs to happen in your mind to support the growth of entrepreneurship in Georgia.

  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in Entrepreneurship, Startups

Could Atlanta Buy A Silicon Valley? The Answers

With a URL with the extension of “maybe” Paul Graham wrote an interesting essay about how a city could go about buying a Silicon Valley.  Towards the end he poses a series of question any city should ask if the scheme will work for them.  Here is my take on the answers.

Do you have good weather?

With the exception of July and August when the heat and humidity forces everyone indoors, the answer to this question is yes.

Do people live downtown, or have they abandoned the center for the suburbs?

Partially yes.  The vast majority of Atlanta’s 5.5 million people do not live downtown.  But a lot do.  According to a recent TAG survey 38% of Georgia entrepreneurs said they were located with 10 miles of Technology Square in Midtown.  Sixty percent were within 15 miles.  I believe this is dense enough.

Would the city be described as “hip” and “tolerant,” or as reflecting “traditional
values?”

With the exception of small pockets inside the perimeter you can’t exactly call Atlanta hip and trendy.  It is a traditional town in a traditional state.  More tolerance is needed in the city too busy to hate.

Are there good universities nearby?

Without a doubt.  Three major research universities are within five miles of each other.  Emory, Georgia Tech, and Georgia State. Major strength of Atlanta.

Are there walkable neighborhoods?

Yes.  Despite the way some folks drive around Atlanta doing 60 miles an hour on 30 mile per hour streets, there are walkable neighborhoods.  Morningside, where I live, is quite walkable.  It’s part of the reason I live there.  So are adjoining neighborhoods like Virginia Highland and Midtown.  Midtown being most important.  It is literally work/live.  And adjacent to Georgia Tech.

Would nerds feel at home?

I don’t know.  I am not a nerd.  I am a semi-geek.  More of a business guy.  But I did once see a coed walking down 5th Street with a “Talk Nerdy To Me” t-shirt on.  So am going to give it a non-qualified to answer yes.

So there you have it.  Hipness aside, Atlanta seems like the type of town that might be able pull off Paul’s plan if it wanted to do so.

What do you think the answers are to Paul’s questions for Atlanta or whatever town you happen to reside?

February 28, 2009  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in Startups

Three

Force of Good turned three 10 days ago. Unlike previous years the day came and went without notice.  FoG continues to grow, and grow at an accelerating rate.  Here are some stats for the past three years.  Visitors and comments are cumulative.

One          Two            Three
Visitors           2,525      15,317        58,483
Comments           52          305             990
Ranking*      788,400    189,138     180,054
*technorati

Traffic is up 325%.  Visitors in 2009 have already surpassed the number for the entire year of 2008.  The current run rate indicates about 90,000 visitors this year.

Comments are up more then traffic.  And while I have no hard evidence to prove this, it is my firm belief that comments are a prime driver of traffic growth and not the other way around.  My writing has pretty much stayed the same since I started FoG.  The community has grown and is feeding off itself. The community and the content that it is creating is improving both the quality of the conversation and the intensity of the discussion.  It’s a good thing.  A beautiful thing.

The purpose of sharing this information is not a chest pounding exercise.  It’s to share a real world example of something you hear experts say all the time.  It takes time to build a blog.  FoG is a living example of that premise.  If you keep at it long enough all of a sudden your blog tips.  I think that point is when the number of comments exceeds the number of posts.  It took just over two years for that to happen here. And once that happens it really is no longer my blog.  It belongs to the folks that read and the folks that comment.  I just try to get things started by providing interesting pieces to get the conversation moving.

My purpose for creating FoG was to find my voice again, learn about social media, see how it works, and a bit of shameless self-promotion.  I have achieved these objectives. I have also accomplished something that I really did not set out to do.

A few years ago I was introduced to Kirsten Dixson. Kirsten is a personal branding guru and coauthor of Career Distinction: Stand Out by Building Your Brand.  We hit it off and she encouraged me to go through a personal branding exercise.  Part of this exercise included 360 degree feedback where people that you have worked with in the past essentially describe the brand attributes of you.  The single word that people used most to describe me?  Intelligent.  There is a problem with intelligent.  It’s like cool.  If you say you are cool, you’re not. If you going around saying you are intelligent it’s worse. And what I think FoG has enabled me to do is demonstrate to a part of the world that interests me that I am smart capable person without actually having come out and say it.  Until now.  The point being a blog enables you to establish what you are and what you stand for to an ever growing audience.

The other brand attributes?  Enterprising, passionate, visionary, and unique.  Unique really was quirky, but who wants to be known as that?

February 26, 2009  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in Web/Tech

Startups: The Seed Stage

This is the second in a series of articles that discusses the stages of a startup. Previously the concept stage was covered.  Today the seed stage is addressed.

The seed stage is the second stage of a technology startup.

The key element being addressed in the seed stage is product development.  Building a prototype, demonstrating it in a controlled environment.  Getting to alpha with friendlies.  Beta testing with people that could become real customers.  Essentially testing and validating the ability to bring the concept to life.

The business focus is on researching the market and potential opportunity.  Refining the business plan and model.  Defining and validating the product offering with customer and expert surveys.  Then taking this information and refining the plan.

The team is growing.  In addition to the initial founder(s) one or two people are making their way on board.  Not all necessarily working full-time, but all increasing their commitment to the company.  There is most likely at least one person totally committed to the project at this stage, particularly if the company requires outside capital.  If you obtain funding the rest of the team comes on board in short order.

You are prospecting for potential customers and partners. Hopefully potential customers are starting to express interest.  Use the product.  Perhaps even pay for it. But revenues are small.  Say less than $500,000.  More often than not non existent.  Put you are starting to see significant use traction.

If there is the potential for intellectual property protection it is being pursued.  Patent strategy is discussed and formed.  Provisionals are filed.  Later in the seed stage patents could be pending.

Funding at this stage is between $100,000 and $1 million. More than $1 million for capital intensive startups.  The earlier the company is in development the less funding it will attract.  The funding may still come from founder(s), family, and friends (you need to have really good family and friends). Government and SBIR grants still can play a lead role.   The pros may show up in the form of Angels.  It is very rare for venture capitalists to play here.  It’s too early.  The valuation range is broad.  Say $250,000 to $3 million pre-money.  Funding could take the form of common stock, convertible debt or preferred equity.

The seed stage is a long haul.  It lasts from nine months to two years.  The big mistake I see made over and over again in the seed stage?  Not focusing on product dev, research, and refining the business model.  Focusing on raising money.  Too much money too soon.  It becomes the entire focus.  Poof!  End of startup. But some companies make it through this marathon and enter the early stage.

And the early stage is when things really get fun.

February 25, 2009  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in Entrepreneurship, Startups

Lent

It's back.  Running from now until April 11.

For the past two years I have given up some form of Internet technology for Lent. 

Two years ago it was Google and Yahoo!  I went back to them both for awhile.  These days it seems like just about everybody has given up on Yahoo!.  And the GOOG borg just keeps sucking us all in.

Last year I give up social networks.  Never really went back to LinkedIn and Facebook.  Twitter has become my social network of choice.

I have been contemplating what to do this year for some time.  Give up Twitter. No way. Drives too much traffic.  I thought of giving up follower scrutiny. Doing auto-follow. But that didn't feel right.

It seems I have started a bit of a trend in Atlanta with this giving up technology thing.  Stephen Fleming announced he was giving up Twitter for Lent.  Knox Massey said all social networks, blogs and limited email.

When others are zigging it's time to zag.  I'm keeping my technology this year.  All of it. 

It's just past midnight.  For Lent I am giving up staying up during the work week.

Let's see now that goes.

Update:  Perhaps I did give up something technical for Lent.  I killed www.weatherby.net.  For the time being blog.weatherby is my home on the Internet.  I also am giving up checking my lance@mindspring.com email address.  Had it since 1995.

  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in Internet

The Julia Roy Incident

It all started innocently enough when I read this tweet.
Julia Roy 1

What's that all about I wondered? Well it turns out that a pack of Web celebs created charity auctions on eBay to benefit charity: water (a worthy cause). Julia Roy was offering a 6 hour dinner and drinks outing.  Being a semi experienced Ebayer, I decided to have a little fun.

Lance 1

It seemed to work.

Julia Roy 2

Emboldened, I went too far.

Lance 2 

Too far, as in putting in a bid for $1,200.  It was a too much for d***e.  He dropped out at $1,101.  I was currently the winning bidder at $1,126. I sent Julia a direct message.

Lance 3

I am indeed happily married with a great wife and two great kids.  And I was mortified, absolutely mortified, that no one was going to outbid me. Julia sent me back this nice message.

Julia Roy 3 

Which sounded all well and good.  I have a personal slush fund that I can do whatever I want with. Abby, my wife, is an understanding lady that let's me do lots of things.  But I was having a real hard time figuring out how I was going to explain spending $1,200 on a charity in conjunction with dinner and drinks with a twenty something blonde in NYC that had been referred to as "the world’s hottest geek".  It would be a cold spring in Atlanta if that came to pass.

Eight days went by.  No other bids. Deepening distress.

Julia and my $1,126 bid made its way to the front page of eBay.

I started scheming up some ways that I might be able to get a little value out of my donation. Julia seems smart.  Understands social media.  Perhaps I could use some of those six hours included in the auction as social media consulting time.  If the bid stood that was my plan.  See if Julia would agree to do some consulting work when I went off to do my next big thing.

I was explaining all this to Calvin Yu and Paul Stamatiou during our bi-weekly Skribit meeting .  Paul got pretty excited.  He knows Josh Spear who founded Undercurrent.  Julia works there as a Senior Agent. He offered to go in half. I told him he did not need to do that.  But I was more than a bit relieved when I saw this.

Stammy 1 

Paul went on to win the auction at the price of $1,549.  He published his thoughts on winning.

My thoughts. All's well that ends well. In a roundabout way I helped raise money and awareness for charity: water.  Paul is going to NYC to hang with his friend and meet a new one.  Increased exposure for Skribit and him are sure to result. And I learned a lesson. 

Natasha Wescoat also has an auction on eBay to benefit charity: water.  I am currently winning.

The auction is for a painting.

Update:  I won the painting auction.

Natasha Wescoat

February 24, 2009  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in Fun, Games, Personal, Web/Tech

Startup Riot Companies Funded

The venture capital community was very well represented at Startup Riot last week. Partners from CEO Ventures, Kinetic Ventures, Noro-Moseley Partners, TechOperators and Value Plus Ventures were all in attendance.  In addition partners from seed stage investing firms Imlay Investments, Profounder, Seraph Group, and Shotput Ventures were on hand. 

Nine firms.  Five of which are less then a year old.  Too many individual angels to list, including the Atlanta Technology Angels. Who says there is no money in Atlanta?  But why are all these investors flocking to a show put on by Sanjay Parekh and a handful of volunteers?

Because companies that presented at Startup Riot last year got funded and or acquired.

Purewire launched at Startup Riot.  Raised $2 million.  Pre revenue, pre product.  Seed stage. 

Global Crypto closed a round led by Imlay and included the Atlanta Technology Angels. Pre revenue, pre product.  Seed stage.

Skribit took a little money from the Edison Fund.  Money that kept Pul Stamatiou from making the trek to the valley when he graduated. Pre revenue.  Seed stage.

Jungle Disk was acquired by Rackspace.  While the amount was undisclosed, based on this report I would venture a guess that Dave Wright is going to put something between $5 million to $10 million in his pocket.  Good for him.  But this is a deal that at least one of the above named venture firms would have liked to take big.  

Investors are going to Startup Riot because it is a source of good deal flow.  And rumor is more deals are in the works.

February 23, 2009  |  Comments  |  Tweet  |  Posted in Angels, Startups, Venture Capital